Why do Democrats think Cindy McCain’s $3,000 designer name bargain dress costed $300,000 - what gives fake hyp?
Icecream asked:
Her Oscar de la renta designer dress cost $3,000 which is a bargain - i usually pay $500 for no name dresses and I’m not a huge huge millionaire like her. Her diamond jewelery was worth close to $200,000 and purse, shoes, accessories etc added up for the stupid misleading headline to read that her “outfit” cost $300,000. Oprah’s purses alone are $20,000+ each. She made a big stink in Paris when that desginer purse store wouldn’t let her in after hours - their purses alone start at $10,000. What’s the big deal for a very wealthy woman to spend her own money on a $3,000 dress for a huge event millions of people would be watching, a historical event at that? Why the **** from the democrats just because she’s not on welfare and can afford her nice taste clothing at bargain costs considering the big label? Celebrities would drop many times that for a similar event. What gives??????
Didn’t Beyonce’s sequenced dress that came up to her crotch with her ***** sticking out cost $80,000 and that was just for a typical concert, so who cares if Cindy who is worth way more than beyonce, spent $3,000 on a classy dress for a presidential convention that would be watched by millions? Democrats are moronic and hypocritical time and again…
of course movie stars own jewelery like that. WHO in this world do you think jewelery companies cater to? Someone on welfare, or someone banking millions/year? Oprah brags every other episode about her huge diamond earings and diamond necklaces she wears on her talk show, always saying that “yes they’re mine”. People own jewelery. Why shouldn’t they wear it just because not everyone in the world can also afford jewelery? Especially for a huge event that comes up maybe once in a handful of people’s lifetime when their husband is running for President?! It’s not some shallow oscars or common award show, it’s a historical event, and yes, the lady’s worth a lot, she donates millions to charity every year, so who cares if she actually owns 300,000 in fine jewelery she decides to wear on a special occassion….i don’t get why all the **** is coming out other than ignorance.
Ruby
Her Oscar de la renta designer dress cost $3,000 which is a bargain - i usually pay $500 for no name dresses and I’m not a huge huge millionaire like her. Her diamond jewelery was worth close to $200,000 and purse, shoes, accessories etc added up for the stupid misleading headline to read that her “outfit” cost $300,000. Oprah’s purses alone are $20,000+ each. She made a big stink in Paris when that desginer purse store wouldn’t let her in after hours - their purses alone start at $10,000. What’s the big deal for a very wealthy woman to spend her own money on a $3,000 dress for a huge event millions of people would be watching, a historical event at that? Why the **** from the democrats just because she’s not on welfare and can afford her nice taste clothing at bargain costs considering the big label? Celebrities would drop many times that for a similar event. What gives??????
Didn’t Beyonce’s sequenced dress that came up to her crotch with her ***** sticking out cost $80,000 and that was just for a typical concert, so who cares if Cindy who is worth way more than beyonce, spent $3,000 on a classy dress for a presidential convention that would be watched by millions? Democrats are moronic and hypocritical time and again…
of course movie stars own jewelery like that. WHO in this world do you think jewelery companies cater to? Someone on welfare, or someone banking millions/year? Oprah brags every other episode about her huge diamond earings and diamond necklaces she wears on her talk show, always saying that “yes they’re mine”. People own jewelery. Why shouldn’t they wear it just because not everyone in the world can also afford jewelery? Especially for a huge event that comes up maybe once in a handful of people’s lifetime when their husband is running for President?! It’s not some shallow oscars or common award show, it’s a historical event, and yes, the lady’s worth a lot, she donates millions to charity every year, so who cares if she actually owns 300,000 in fine jewelery she decides to wear on a special occassion….i don’t get why all the **** is coming out other than ignorance.
Ruby
